Critical discussion of some basic issues raised in the logic, epistemology, history, and ontology of the natural sciences
pp. 170-252
Abstrakt
In this chapter I have brought together some critical reflections on the work of some of my colleagues in the field. I shall discuss first Stegmüller's conception of the problem and the criterion of empirical significance in scientific languages. Then I shall reflect critically on Popper's Logic of Scientific Discovery and Hempel's explanation of scientific laws. In a third section I plan to say something about Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Section 4 will be concerned with Lakatos' methodology of scientific research programs. In Section 5 I shall turn to Hübner's Critique of Scientific Reason,and particularly to his conception of the nature of scientific theories. Finally, I shall make an effort to compare my own view of the nature of the natural sciences with that of Patrick Heelan.
Publication details
Published in:
Kockelmans Joseph (1993) Ideas for a hermeneutic phenomenology of the natural sciences. Dordrecht, Springer.
Seiten: 170-252
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1958-0_4
Referenz:
Kockelmans Joseph (1993) Critical discussion of some basic issues raised in the logic, epistemology, history, and ontology of the natural sciences, In: Ideas for a hermeneutic phenomenology of the natural sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, 170–252.