Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Buch | Kapitel

180031

Phenomenology and the scientific image

defending naturalism from its critics

Richard Sebold

pp. 45-68

Abstrakt

At the beginning of the twentieth century, why did Husserl think a new philosophical method was needed? Why phenomenology? For Husserl, what primarily motivated the development of a new philosophical perspective were the failures, as he saw it, of the then dominant schools of philosophy. One such school singled out by Husserl was naturalistic philosophy, or roughly trying to answer philosophical problems by using the scientific method. So while phenomenology was to be a rigorous science, it was explicitly cast as an alternative to and a progressive step beyond scientific naturalism.1 Why phenomenology? In part, to overcome the inadequacies of naturalism, according to Husserl (1965).

Publication details

Published in:

Reynolds Jack, Sebold Richard (2016) Phenomenology and science: confrontations and convergences. Dordrecht, Springer.

Seiten: 45-68

DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-51605-3_3

Referenz:

Sebold Richard (2016) „Phenomenology and the scientific image: defending naturalism from its critics“, In: J. Reynolds & R. Sebold (eds.), Phenomenology and science, Dordrecht, Springer, 45–68.