Buch | Kapitel
Epistemic and semantic reflections on scientific realism
pp. 97-101
Abstrakt
Of the three points made by L.J. Cohen, I shall consider two: his refutation of irrealism and his argument that van Fraassen's version of irrealism is subject to the same difficulties van Fraassen has found with realism.
Publication details
Published in:
Ullmann-Margalit Edna (1988) Science in reflection: the Israel colloquium: studies in history, philosophy, and sociology of science volume 3. Dordrecht, Springer.
Seiten: 97-101
Referenz:
Zemach Eddy M. (1988) „Epistemic and semantic reflections on scientific realism“, In: E. Ullmann-Margalit (ed.), Science in reflection, Dordrecht, Springer, 97–101.