Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Series | Buch | Kapitel

196071

Tests versus contests

a theory of adjudication

Warren Thorngate Barbara Carroll

pp. 431-438

Abstrakt

Adjudicated contests are often held to determine who merits a limited resource. Attempts to employ consistent and fair criteria of merit are vitiated by increases in the contestant population; as fair contests grow, they eventually devolve into unfair ones. Contestants can use any of three strategies to adapt to this devolutionary circumstance. Psychological aspects of these strategies are outlined, and their limitations discussed.

Publication details

Published in:

Hyland Michael E., Baker William J, van Hezewijk René, Terwee Sybe J S (1990) Recent trends in theoretical psychology: proceedings of the third biennial conference of the international society for theoretical psychology april 17–21, 1989. Dordrecht, Springer.

Seiten: 431-438

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9688-8_43

Referenz:

Thorngate Warren, Carroll Barbara (1990) „Tests versus contests: a theory of adjudication“, In: M. E. Hyland, W.J. Baker, R. Van Hezewijk & S.J.S. Terwee (eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology, Dordrecht, Springer, 431–438.