Buch | Kapitel
Conventional implicatures and presupposition
pp. 198-206
Abstrakt
Whereas the 1970s have given rise to a great number of works on presupposition (cf. Kempson 1975; Wilson 1975; Kiparsky/Kiparsky 1971; Gazdar 1979; Ducrot 1972; Rogers et al. 1977; Oh/Dinneen 1979; Levinson 1983 a. o.), the 1980s up to now have shown a major preference for the issue of implicature (cf. Horn 1984, 1989; Sperber/Wilson 1995; Levinson 2000; Carston 2002; Potts 2005; Chierchia 2013). Nonetheless, a revival for the issue of presupposition has been observed, mainly due to a change of paradigm in semantics, as dynamic semantics (cf. Beaver 2001; Roberts 2004)) and intensional semantics (cf. von Fintel/Heim 2011). In another way, whereas most neo-Gricean (cf. Levinson 2000) and post-Gricean (cf. Carston 2002; Wilson/Sperber 2012) had abandoned the Gricean notion of conventional implicature, it has been recently set at the centre of issues as clefts and exclusive sentences for instance (cf. Beaver 2014).
Publication details
Published in:
Liedtke Frank, Tuchen Astrid (2018) Handbuch Pragmatik. Stuttgart, Metzler.
Seiten: 198-206
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_19
Referenz:
Moeschler Jacques (2018) „Conventional implicatures and presupposition“, In: F. Liedtke & A. Tuchen (eds.), Handbuch Pragmatik, Stuttgart, Metzler, 198–206.