Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Series | Buch | Kapitel

209580

Introduction

Klaus Fröhlich

pp. 1-13

Abstrakt

This study is concerned with the problem of political participation in pre-revolutionary Russia. It is generally known that the institutions which help in forming public opinion and in balancing the interests of divergent social forces found entry into the political life of the Russian Empire only at a late date — hardly before the beginning of the 20th century — and then only partially and with hesitation. As a result of delayed industrialization, growing social tensions had led to an acute problem of political participation by broader strata of the population. During the 19th century, however, the "art of associating" had lagged behind the demands for participation. These had to assert themselves against the political system of autocracy which, in the interest of self-preservation, tried to suppress this problem by means of bureaucratic regimentation and police supervision. It was only the 1905 revolution which finally forced the Tsar to guarantee certain civil rights and to summon a parliament. With the opening of the First Duma in April 1906, Russia seemed intent on following the path of her Western neighbours, via constitutional monarchy to parliamentary democratic solutions to the problem of political participation.

Publication details

Published in:

Fröhlich Klaus (1981) The emergence of Russian constitutionalism 1900–1904: the relationship between social mobilization and political group formation in pre-revolutionary Russia. Dordrecht, Springer.

Seiten: 1-13

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-8884-2_1

Referenz:

Fröhlich Klaus (1981) Introduction, In: The emergence of Russian constitutionalism 1900–1904, Dordrecht, Springer, 1–13.