Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Series | Buch | Kapitel

209584

Conclusion

Klaus Fröhlich

pp. 235-252

Abstrakt

‘The liberation movement in the broad sense, i.e. the struggle for the principles of liberalism, for individual freedom, the rule of law and self-government, had long been in existence and had at no point disappeared. In the 1860s it even inspired the autocratic state. But under Nicholas II the nature of this struggle altered. It concentrated exclusively and completely on the fall of the autocracy; it became an open war against [the autocracy]. And precisely this war soon took hold of the whole of society’.

Publication details

Published in:

Fröhlich Klaus (1981) The emergence of Russian constitutionalism 1900–1904: the relationship between social mobilization and political group formation in pre-revolutionary Russia. Dordrecht, Springer.

Seiten: 235-252

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-8884-2_5

Referenz:

Fröhlich Klaus (1981) Conclusion, In: The emergence of Russian constitutionalism 1900–1904, Dordrecht, Springer, 235–252.