Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Series | Buch | Kapitel

213642

Michael Oakeshott and augustinianism after Hobbes and Hegel

David McIlwain

pp. 177-198

Abstrakt

This chapter elucidates the subtle relationship between Michael Oakeshott's skeptical political theory of a neutral civil authority and his rich conception of poetic individuality, offering a detailed investigation of how Oakeshott moved between mythology and political theory in combining the thought of Hobbes and Augustine. McIlwain argues that Oakeshott used these two thinkers to separate the human will from the fatalism implied by a completely rational account of experience and then to "eternalize" Hegel at the historical stage of the pax Romana. Oakeshott's adherence to a modern philosophical monism is thus revealed to be elevated by an earthly and poetic Augustinianism that avoids both "Gnostic" historical necessity and supernatural dualism. Oakeshott's theory is then described in terms of the almost "religious' intensity of self-completion.

Publication details

Published in:

McIlwain David (2019) Michael Oakeshott and Leo Strauss: the politics of renaissance and enlightenment. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Seiten: 177-198

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13381-8_9

Referenz:

McIlwain David (2019) Michael Oakeshott and augustinianism after Hobbes and Hegel, In: Michael Oakeshott and Leo Strauss, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 177–198.