Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Series | Buch | Kapitel

149042

Abstrakt

There is a remarkable unity to the work of Edmund Husserl, but there are also many difficulties in it. The unity is the result of a single personal and philosophical quest working itself out in concrete phenomenological analyses; the difficulties are due to the inadequacy of initial conceptions which becomes felt as those analyses become progressively deeper and more extensive.1 Anyone who has followed the course of Husserl's work is struck by the constant reemergence of the same problems and by the insightfulness of the inquiries which press toward their solution. However one also becomes aware of Husserl's own dissatisfaction with his work, once so movingly expressed in a personal note.2 It is the purpose of the present work to examine and revive one of the issues which gave Husserl difficulty, namely, the problem of an introduction to phenomenology.

Publication details

Published in:

McKenna William R (1982) Husserl's "Introductions to phenomenology": interpretation and critique. Dordrecht, Springer.

Seiten: 1-5

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7573-6_1

Referenz:

McKenna William R (1982) Introduction, In: Husserl's "Introductions to phenomenology", Dordrecht, Springer, 1–5.