Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Zeitschrift | Band | Artikel

173842

(Math, science, ?)

M. Kary

pp. 321-339

Abstrakt

In science as in mathematics, it is popular to know little and resent much about category theory. Less well known is how common it is to know little and like much about set theory. The set theory of almost all scientists, and even the average mathematician, is fundamentally different from the formal set theory that is contrasted against category theory. The latter two are often opposed by saying one emphasizes Substance, the other Form. However, in all known systems of mathematics throughout history, mathematicians have moved fluidly between ideas conceived of as thing-like, property-like, and process-like. On the other hand one way to advance science is to better distinguish between thing, property, and process. All this constitutes a distracting background for those interested in, or distressed by, the possible application of category theory to science, and to mathematics as well.

Publication details

Published in:

(2009) Memory evolutive systems. Axiomathes 19 (3).

Seiten: 321-339

Referenz:

Kary M. (2009) „(Math, science, ?)“. Axiomathes 19 (3), 321–339.