Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Buch | Kapitel

188247

Architecture as representation of nature

Tomàs Llorens

pp. 307-317

Abstrakt

Classical architecture included ornaments that were representations of natural forms. However, it also included ornaments whose derivation from nature was, to say the least, disputable. Furthermore, this difference did not play a significant role in the articulation of the doctrine of classical architecture, as it might if it had been taken, for example, as a criterion for a distinction between the orders. Leaving aside a few isolated examples, like Vitruvius's mythical account of the origin of the Corinthian capital, the mimetic quality of architectural ornament was, as a rule, not discussed systematically in classical treatises.

Publication details

Published in:

Herzfeld Michael, Lenhart Margot D (1982) Semiotics 1980. Dordrecht, Springer.

Seiten: 307-317

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9137-1_30

Referenz:

Llorens Tomàs (1982) Architecture as representation of nature, In: Semiotics 1980, Dordrecht, Springer, 307–317.