Deutsche Gesellschaft
für phänomenologische Forschung

Series | Buch | Kapitel

205758

Berkeley's divine language argument

pp. 129-142

Abstrakt

Dean Berkeley wrote Alciphron during his somewhat impatient stay in Newport. He wanted to get on with the Bermuda project. Students of Berkeley have been impatient with the Alciphron — too much apologetics and too little philosophy. There is one apparent exception. The fourth dialogue, "The Truth of Theism," contains a proof of God's existence. But on a closer look many have found an unexciting version of the design argument, a version easily slain by Hume. T. E. Jessop, not one to underestimate Berkeley, puts it bluntly: "… the proof is the usual one from effect to cause, not the one peculiar to Berkeley."1

Publication details

Published in:

Sosa Ernest (1987) Essays on the philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht, Springer.

Seiten: 129-142

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4798-6_8

Referenz:

(1987) „Berkeley's divine language argument“, In: E. Sosa (ed.), Essays on the philosophy of George Berkeley, Dordrecht, Springer, 129–142.