
Wolfgang Spohn
Defeasible normative reasoning
2020
Synthese 197/4

How essentialism properly understood might reconcile realism and social constructivism
2014
in: New directions in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht : Springer

Reversing 30 years of discussion
2012
Synthese 187/1

Normativity is the key to the difference between the human and the natural sciences
2011
in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Dordrecht : Springer

Multiple contraction revisited
2010
in: Epsa epistemology and methodology of science, Dordrecht : Springer

Laws are persistent inductive schemes
2004
in: Induction and deduction in the sciences, Dordrecht : Springer

Carnap versus Quine, or aprioristic versus naturalized epistemology, or a lesson from dispositions
2003
in: Language, truth and knowledge, Dordrecht : Springer

A brief comparison of Pollock's defeasible reasoning and ranking functions
2002
Synthese 131/1
